{"id":7603,"date":"2026-05-09T09:37:54","date_gmt":"2026-05-09T09:37:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/africanamericanvoice.net\/?p=7603"},"modified":"2026-07-02T09:41:34","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T09:41:34","slug":"a-case-for-war-irans-non-existent-nuclear-weapons-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/africanamericanvoice.net\/?p=7603","title":{"rendered":"A Case for War? Iran\u2019s Non-Existent Nuclear Weapons Program"},"content":{"rendered":"

By<\/span>William O. Beeman<\/a><\/p>\n

The United States\u2019 repeated attacks on Iran over more than 40 years are based on a lie: that Iran has a nuclear weapons program.<\/p>\n

Vice-President J.D. Vance, who led the U.S. delegation in cease-fire talks with Iran on April 10-11, once again repeated this lie in his demand that Iran declare that it \u201cwill not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon.\u201d<\/p>\n

The current Iranian regime has done much that has disturbed the world community since the Islamic Revolution of 1978-1979. They have supported Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, the Assad Regime in Syria, and militant groups throughout the Middle East. They have repressed dissent in their own country, including incarceration and execution of many thousands of Iranian citizens, with little justification. For these actions the regime deserves severe condemnation.<\/p>\n

However, what Iran has not done and has never done is to develop nuclear weapons.<\/p>\n

Iran\u2019s critics hide behind the phrase \u201cIran\u2019s nuclear ambitions\u201d as if that vague phrase constitutes proof that a nuclear weapons program exists. It does not exist and has never existed. So why does this unsubstantiated accusation remain a live issue?<\/p>\n

The answer is surprisingly simple. When Iran was an ally of the United States during the reign of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was re-installed from exile in a CIA-led coup in 1953, the United States fervently encouraged Iran to develop nuclear technology. After the Iranian Revolution of 1978-79, when Iran was seen as opposed to the United States, its nuclear program was suddenly seen as suspect and dangerous.<\/p>\n

Iranian nuclear development started during the Eisenhower administration as part of the \u201cAtoms for Peace\u201d program. In 1957, the United States signed a Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement with Iran stipulating that the United States would provide Iran with technical assistance, nuclear fuel, and a small research reactor. This resulted in the establishment of the Tehran Nuclear Research Center in 1959. In 1967, under the Johnson administration, the United States delivered a five-megawatt research reactor to Iran along with weapons-grade highly enriched uranium to fuel it.<\/p>\n

In 1968, Iran and the United States were founding signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) which was eventually signed by virtually every nation on earth except for Israel, India, and Pakistan. (North Korea initially signed and then withdrew. South Sudan, founded in 2011, never signed the treaty).<\/p>\n

The NPT prohibits nations that did not have a nuclear weapons program at the time of signing from ever developing nuclear weapons. At the same time, the NPT guarantees the right of all countries to pursue non-nuclear-weapons programs to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. The treaty also requires nations that already had nuclear weapons to protect the rights of other nations to develop their own nuclear technology, including the right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. (Aside from Iran, Germany, Netherlands, Japan, Brazil, and Argentina all have active nuclear enrichment programs today).<\/p>\n

From this point on, until the 1978-79 Revolution, the United States encouraged nuclear development in Iran, urging companies like Westinghouse and General Electric to sell nuclear power reactors to the Shah\u2019s government. At one point 23 nuclear power plants were envisioned.<\/p>\n

But following the Iranian Revolution and the 444-day hostage crisis when U.S. officials were held at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Iran became suspect in the eyes of the United States. The nuclear program that had once been so fervently encouraged became a point of attack against the Islamic Republic.<\/p>\n

The idea that Iran was developing a nuclear weapon stems from a 1984 United Press International article entitled \u201cAyatollah\u2019s Bomb in Production for Iran<\/a>.\u201d On April 26, 1984, the U.S State Department under the Reagan administration \u2014\u00a0with no evidence that Iran had the equipment or the capability to produce a bomb \u2014\u00a0nevertheless urged a world-wide ban on providing nuclear materials to the country.<\/p>\n

The eight-year Iran-Iraq war was then underway, and the Reagan administration feared that Iran could develop a weapon to use against Iraq. Another press article from\u00a0The Washington Post<\/em>\u00a0in 1987 entitled \u201cAtomic Ayatollahs<\/a>\u201d continued the alarm.<\/p>\n

Even though Western intelligence agencies repeatedly insisted that Iran did not have a nuclear weapons program, U.S. officials \u2014 buoyed by negative public opinion of the Iranian regime \u2014\u00a0continued the accusation. The first U.S. imposed economic sanctions levied on Iran in relation to its nuclear program were imposed by President Bill Clinton in 1995.<\/p>\n

In 2003 the George W. Bush administration, under urging from neo-conservatives bent on effecting regime change throughout the Middle East, again accused Iran of having a nuclear weapons program.<\/p>\n

From this point on, the specter of Iran\u2019s \u201cnuclear ambitions\u201d became a mantra in Washington, despite Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei having issued a religious edict prohibiting nuclear weapons development that same year. President Bush imposed further U.S. economic sanctions, increasing tensions between the two nations.<\/p>\n

After more than 10 years, the Obama administration was able to create the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). As part of the agreement, Iran agreed to curtail its uranium enrichment program as a \u201cconfidence building\u201d measure to assure that it would not violate the provisions of the longstanding NPT.<\/p>\n

After President Trump canceled the JCOPA during his first presidential term in 2017, the idea that Iran still had \u201cnuclear ambitions\u201d became the baseline excuse for continued U.S. sanctions. No matter Iran\u2019s transgressions, this one accusation remains the principal reason for continued hostilities culminating in the current war between the two nations.<\/p>\n

The base fact is that Iran has never been shown to have had a nuclear weapons program. All intelligence organizations involved with nuclear containment agree on this fact. Nevertheless, as was seen in the failure of the Islamabad talks, Iran\u2019s \u201cnuclear ambitions\u201d continue to be the pretext for U.S. attacks.<\/p>\n

Source: Published without changes from American Community Media<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ByWilliam O. Beeman The United States\u2019 repeated attacks on Iran over more than 40 years are based on<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7604,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-regular-column"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t